Translate
Investigation findings
View information about King County Sheriff's Office complaint investigations.
OLEO's recommendations on findings
| Case number | OLEO's role | Date findings submitted to KCSO | Initial KCSO recommended disposition | OLEO recommended Disposition | Final KCSO Disposition | Memos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IIU2024-131 | Monitor/Certify | November 1, 2024 | Subject Deputy 1:
Subject Deputy 2:
Subject Detective:
|
Subject Deputy 1:
Subject Deputy 2:
Subject Detective:
|
Subject Deputy 1:
Subject Deputy 2:
Subject Detective:
|
Read the memo (322KB) |
| IIU2024-115 | Monitor/Certify | August 27, 2024 |
|
|
Read the memo (159KB) | |
| IIU2024-084 | Monitor/Certify | July 23, 2024 | Subject Employee 1:
Subject Employee 2:
|
Subject Employee 1:
Subject Employee 2:
|
Subject Employee 1:
Subject Employee 2:
|
Read the memo (538KB) |
| IIU2023-189 | Monitor/Certify | June 27, 2024 | Subject Deputy 1:
Subject Deputy 2:
|
Subject Deputy 1:
Subject Deputy 2:
|
Subject Deputy 1:
Subject Deputy 2:
|
Read the memo (389KB) |
| IIU2023-241 | Monitor/Certify | April 23, 2024 |
|
|
Read the memo (392KB) | |
| IIU2023-235 | Monitor/Certify | February 23, 2024 |
|
|
|
Read the memo (190KB) |
| IIU2023-205 | Monitor/Certify | January 3, 2024 |
|
|
|
Read the memo (174KB) |
| IIU2022-297 | Monitor/Certify | April 10, 2023 |
|
|
|
Read the memo (148KB) |
| IIU2022-011 | Monitor/Certify | May 16, 2022 | Subject Deputy 1:
Subject Deputy 2:
Subject Deputy 3:
Subject Deputy 4:
|
Subject Deputy 1:
Subject Deputy 2:
Subject Deputy 3:
Subject Deputy 4:
|
Subject Deputy 1:
Subject Deputy 2:
Subject Deputy 3:
Subject Deputy 4:
|
Read the memo (253KB) |
| IIU2022-010 | Monitor/Certify | May 11, 2022 |
|
|
|
Read the memo (141KB) |
| IIU2021-228 | Monitor/Certify | October 15, 2021 | Subject Employee 1:
Subject Employee 2:
|
Subject Employee 1:
Subject Employee 2:
|
Subject Employee 1:
Subject Employee 2:
|
Read the memo (167KB) |
| IIU2021-132 | Monitor/Certify | August 12, 2021 | Subject Employee 1:
Subject Employee 2:
|
Subject Employee 1:
Subject Employee 2:
|
Subject Employee 1:
Subject Employee 2:
|
The findings have been translated by a human translator into these languages: Read the amended findings (629KB) The amended findings have been translated by a human translator into these languages: |
| IIU2020-436 | Monitor/Certify | February 16, 2021 | Subject Deputy 1:
Subject Deputy 2:
|
Subject Deputy 1:
Subject Deputy 2:
|
Subject Deputy 1:
Subject Deputy 2:
|
Read the amended findings (241KB) The amended findings have been translated by a human translator into these languages: |
Understanding findings
A finding provides an analysis of the facts collected during the investigation. According to Sheriff's Office policies:
The standard of proof to sustain an allegation generally requires a “preponderance of evidence” (i.e., “more likely than not”) that the policy violation occurred based on the facts.
They can also use the higher standard of “clear and convincing evidence” if there is an allegation of criminal or serious misconduct. And if there is a likelihood of suspension, demotion, or termination.
Here are the dispositions imposed in a finding. It informs the type of discipline issued against an accused employee:
- Sustained: Enough evidence supports the allegation, and it was a policy violation
- Non-sustained: Insufficient evidence exists to prove or disprove the allegation
- Unfounded: The allegation is not factual, or the incident did not occur as described
- Exonerated: The alleged incident occurred but was lawful and proper